Krug 2008: “élégance intemporelle”

The Tin House in a suburban street in Shepherd’s Bush might not seem like the most salubrious venue for the launch of a leading prestige cuvée champagne from a vintage that many have already marked down as ‘great’ – although only time will show if that epithet is truly applicable. But as we are told at the outset, Krug embraces what it likes to call “rough luxury”.

As recent similar events over the past few years have clearly demonstrated, however obscure and hard to find the venue is, these are experiences worth attending, for Krug is nothing if not generous in sharing comparable or perhaps we should say, contrasting, wines, to give the newly launched fizz some perspective.

Thus, we kicked off with a glass of Grande Cuvée Edition 169 which is based on the 2013 harvest, with 60% of the blend coming from that year. A harvest which head winemaker, Julie Cavil describes as “not really a good vintage in Champagne. It was cold with lots of rain and the last October harvest the region had. There were problems with rot and the resultant wines were very fresh, [rather] acid and lacked elements like ripe yellow fruit.”

But this is where the magic of blending Grande Cuvée comes to the fore. The combination of a total of 146 different wines in the blend, taken from 13 harvests stretching back to 2000, brings balance, depth of flavour and attractively rich expression. “You need individual character in Grande Cuvée and we cultivate the differences, that’s the message we give wine growers, who we but buy grapes from.”

It is on tip top form and a reminder that Grande Cuvée doesn’t need to be based on a fine vintage to shine. In fact, to demonstrate the reverse, Olivier Krug is fond of referencing a vertical, blind tasting of five or so Grande Cuvées based on the years around 2001, where all the tasting room team – and that included him, Cavil and her predecessor Eric Lebel — chose the Grande Cuvée based on 2001 as their favourite. And they did so despite the inclusion of blends based on famed years like 2002 and 1999.

After lingering over Edition 169, as a second warm up wine to the 2008, we have the previously released — and generously bestowed with sunshine – 2006 vintage. It proved to be quite a contrast to the 2008, which I guess was precisely the idea.

Cavil reiterated the point that Lebel had made about the 2006 at the launch back in October 2019. “During the summer of 2006 there were more than 23 days when the temperature was above 30degC, compared to the average for the region of seven.” After the scorching heat of July followed by a wet and rather cloudy August the harvest was saved, as is often the case in Champagne, by sunshine in early September just before picking started.

As Cavil says 2006 – which was her first vintage working with Lebel — produced wines of “great generosity, roundness; greedy wines”, as she puts it. There’s also a noticeable creaminess to the mouthfeel. In Krug parlance – they like to give a short label to each vintage — the ’06 was “capricious indulgence”.  

They have named the 2008 “élégance intemporelle” which Cavil translates as “classic beauty” though “timeless elegance” sounds more poetic. Perhaps she is referencing the fact that 2008 was a cool year and a return to the classic northern climate conditions in the region. It was “cool, but with no extremes, ripening took place slowly and steadily with no bursts of heat. And that’s resulted in a wine of great elegance and intensity, that is very well structured. It’s straight and classical.”

In fact, it’s currently on the austere side with an incredible racy, grapefruit intensity that’s hard to get past, even though you can sense the depth and hints of great complexity lurking within. But that will take even more time than the 13 years that have already past to evolve.

It is very much redolent of the 2008 vintage, but, given the startlingly fresh attack — that’s still strongly in evidence returning to the glass more than ten minutes after It’s poured — it’s hard to believe 53% of Pinot Noir in the blend comes mainly from Krug’s vineyards in the Montage de Reims Sud, including Aÿ, Mareuil-sur-Aÿ, Bouzy and Ambonnay. You’d suspect the Pinot crus would be the cooler north facing slopes of Verzy and Verzenay.

I put this to Cavil, but she prefers to highlight the fact there’s more Meunier than Chardonnay in the blend, 25% compared to 22% of the latter, which she says, “Brings tension and citrus notes”, while the Chardonnay “imbues the wine with fruit”.

In the glass beside the 2008 we are poured some Grande Cuvée Edition 164, that is the blend which is based on the 2008 harvest. A fabulous treat, and worth the trip to the Tin House on its own, Cavil brilliantly encapsulates its essence by describing it as “breakfast in a glass, there’s toast, marmalade, coffee and butter all there”.

Krug 2008, RRP £265 (at all major fine wine retailers)

Still places available at my WSET tasting

Next week I’m doing another Champagne tasting at the London HQ of the Wine & Spirt Education Trust (WSET). This time, with purchases for Christmas and the New Year partly in mind, I’m concentrating on pointing people in the direction of some great champagnes from slightly less known producers, which match or better some of the wines made by the big names. And partly as a result of being less well known, your money goes a lot further in terms of getting more exciting wine.

There are eight different producers involved, four growers and four co-operatives. We start with a fine pair of contrasting Continue reading “Still places available at my WSET tasting”

Gosset Celebris tasting: 1988 to 2004

Gosset glass launch pic BOver the years I’ve come to like the champagnes made by Gosset more and more. As Didier Gimonnet said to me on a recent visit to Cuis, producers should be judged on the quality of their whole range, not merely on one super-charged cuvée that they produce in minute quantities, as he suggested some commentators are apt to do. But as with the excellent Gimonnet wines, I’d be very happy drinking any Gosset champagnes, Continue reading “Gosset Celebris tasting: 1988 to 2004”

Fifteen prestige cuvées from 2002

The prospect of tasting 15 prestige cuvée champagnes in one sitting later this week is a mouth-watering one.  Especially as they are all from the celebrated 2002 vintage, which will probably, with a little competition from 2008 & ’09, go down as the finest vintage of the past decade. But it’s interesting to speculate — before I have seen the actual list — who will be included in the line-up?

I imagine Dom Pérignon, Cristal and Krug will be there, the last named only released to a rapturous welcome early this year, while Cristal will potentially boast considerable bottle age, given it was first made available over seven years ago. I guess Dom Ruinart, fabulously rich and powerful in 2002 and Clicquot’s La Grande Dame will complete the Moët-Hennessy quartet in the line-up.

Pol Roger Sir Winston Churchill and Salon are two further acclaimed ‘02 releases, and I’m pretty sure Taittinger’s Comte de Champagne will feature (see my piece on the recent Finest Bubble vertical tasting of Comte 1996-2006 which included the 2002). To these eight we can probably add Continue reading “Fifteen prestige cuvées from 2002”

Bollinger shows how it restores old bottles in larger formats

Before last month’s historic tasting of old vintages of Bollinger dating back to 1830, the year after the house was founded, on our tour of the cellars we saw the restoration work the winemaking team does by hand, using ancient methods.

In this short video we can hear Bollinger assistant winemaker Denis Bunner describing how the winemaking team, working in the cellars, are restoring Jeroboams of Bollinger ‘RD’ 2000. Disgorging the wines by hand (à la volée), tasting them all and then topping them up, before giving them their final cork, all of which is done by hand, using traditional skills.

Comte de Champagne vertical tasting 2006-1996

Comte line up 4 VerticalHistorically Champagne has not been seen as a wine appropriate for investment purposes, certainly not in the same way as say red Bordeaux. The three most commonly traded prestige cuvées have in the past been Dom Pérignon, Krug and Louis Roederer’s Cristal. Vintage Krug and Cristal, both produced in far smaller volumes than Dom Pérignon, tend to have the higher values, though which comes out on top depends on the Continue reading “Comte de Champagne vertical tasting 2006-1996”

Veuve Clicquot launches ’08 vintage on the Côte de Nuits

Started last week in Burgundy at Clos des Lambrays in Morey-Saint-Denis c/o Veuve Clicquot, for the launch of their 2008 Vintage Réserve. Clicquot never likes to do anything by halves, witness the event they organised in June 2014 around burying 300 bottles and 50 magnums on the Baltic seabed to test how champagne ages there;
http://www.decanter.com/news/wine-news/587201/veuve-clicquot-to-age-champagne-in-baltic-sea#XfUWqDDh2FG7AhpI.99

Continue reading “Veuve Clicquot launches ’08 vintage on the Côte de Nuits”

Krug launches 2002 vintage & changes Grand Cuvée label (slightly)

Bjoern Weissgerber, group executive chef at Zuma restaurants was kind enough to take this picture of Eric Lebel with me at the 2002 launch

Yesterday I had the chance to try the newly released Krug 2002 vintage, along with a group of top sommeliers and chefs, many of whom are Krug ambassadors. One of the last, if not the last, major house to put its ’02 offering on the market, the expectations were high. The wine isn’t a disappointment. Subtle, gentle, harmonious, it has that indefinable quality, that extra dimension, lift and intensity that only the top vintages in Champagne offer with a silky texture and long finish. To put the new wine in context after a mandatory glass of Grande Cuvée, the current release based Continue reading “Krug launches 2002 vintage & changes Grand Cuvée label (slightly)”

Ruinart: secrets of Blanc de Blancs

Not many of my friends see tasting champagne as work and sampling Ruinart Blanc de Blancs in bottle, magnum and jeroboam is even less likely to qualify in their eyes, though they’d mostly be puzzled to see the point in that – tasting the same wine* in three different formats that is. Add three different vintages of Ruinart’s prestige line Dom Ruinart Blanc de Blancs, including my favourite vintage of the 80s, and even I have to admit it just sounds like an extremely pleasant morning. And it was.

Frédéric Panaïotis took over as head winemaker at Ruinart in 2007 and I Continue reading “Ruinart: secrets of Blanc de Blancs”

Consumers pick their under £20 favourites

I reported last month on the blind tasting Anthony Rose and I did of 18 champagnes and sparklers priced at £20 and under. A couple of days after we did our tasting, I invited a group of eight consumers round to taste the same 18 wines to see whether they agreed with our assessments.

These were not experts, although they all like the odd glass of fizz, and it was perhaps slightly unfair to ask them to taste 18 different sparkling wines in one sitting. Even people working full time in the wine trade would find assessing this number of sparklers accurately in one go a pretty difficult task. However it did throw up some interesting results and amusing comments and while they didn’t completely agree with us by any means, they did generally like many of the wines we highlighted in the latter part of the tasting. They didn’t much enjoy the Veuve Devanley Brut NV (Morrisons £12) which we gave one of our highest scores to, though one taster picked up ‘biscuity notes’. The Chapel Down English fizz was universally well received and scored the highest marks.

The panel discuss the wines
The panel discuss the wines

Top ten fizzes consumers voted for with comments from the tasting panel:

Chapel Down Brut Vintage Réserve NV: “Fruity, pleasant aromas, very drinkable. Stylish label stands out from the others,” JH. “Surprisingly pleasant without any bitter aftertaste,” MT. “Really liked this, with marmitey notes. Liked label too,” LT. “Quite good, with a light bubbles,” PT. “Classy label, good fruit, nice finish. Kentishman done good,” NH.

Benoît Renaud Brut NV: “Light, refreshing, delicate fizz with fruity after taste leaves you wanting more,” JH. “Lighter aroma, very dry, pleasant and dry, suitable for a long session,” MT. “Well-balanced, peachy, highly drinkable, longer lasting on the Ashley,” NH. “Not as fruity as some but has lovely flavour. Could drink a lot of this,” ES.

Nicolas Feuillatte Grande Réserve Brut NV: “Like this, would pour it for the ChampagneGuru,” NH. “Fruity little number that stays on the palate,” ES. “Decent weight and richness on the palate, good finish,” CF.

Abel Chalot Brut NV: “Rounded dry and pleasant first taste, a good drop to end with,” MT. “Very good,” LT. “More flavoursome than most, relatively good,” ML.

De Vallois Brut NV: “Quite rich initial taste and warm, lingering flavour,” MT. “Quite nice aroma, hint of pear and a flavour that delivers,” ML.

Defontaine Brut NV: “A good party fizz and pre-dinner drink,” JH. “Powerful initial taste, aromatic, rounded on the plate, moderate length,” MT. “Very dry, fine aroma, dried apricots,” NH.

Laytons Brut Réserve NV: “Very bubbly and pleasantly dry, really tasted authentic,” MT. “Creamy, well-balanced,” NH.

Louis Delaunay Brut NV: “I liked this, nice and dry and smooth, I’d buy it,” LT. “Quite mellow with a long finish,” CF.

Andre Carpentier Brut NV: “Quite light, but nice flavour,” PT.

Comte de Senneval Brut: “Long and pleasant aftertaste, easy style I could drink all night,” JH.